Three most important quality propositions stated by most of the gurus in quality management

Quality management gurus have made significant contributions to the field of quality management, and their propositions have shaped the way organizations approach quality improvement. Here are three propositions stated by most quality management gurus.

W. Edwards Deming: The System of Profound Knowledge

W. Edwards Deming: The System of Profound Knowledge

W. Edwards Deming, one of the most influential quality management gurus, proposed a holistic approach to managing quality through what he called “The System of Profound Knowledge.” This system consists of four interrelated components:

a. Appreciation for a System: Deming emphasized understanding the organization as a system with interconnected processes, where optimizing individual components may not necessarily improve the overall performance.

b. Knowledge of Variation: According to Deming, variation is a natural occurrence in any process, and understanding and reducing variation is essential for improving quality and achieving consistency.

c. Theory of Knowledge: This component emphasizes the importance of using data and statistical methods to make informed decisions and drive continuous improvement.

d. Psychology: Deming recognized the importance of understanding human behavior and motivation in achieving quality improvement. He emphasized creating an environment that fosters intrinsic motivation, teamwork, and a sense of pride in workmanship.

Joseph Juran: Quality Trilogy

Joseph Juran: Quality Trilogy

Joseph Juran, another renowned quality management guru, proposed the concept of the “Quality Trilogy.” According to Juran, managing quality involves three fundamental processes:

a. Quality Planning: Juran emphasized the importance of proactively planning for quality, which involves setting quality goals, identifying the processes required to achieve those goals, and establishing metrics to measure progress.

b. Quality Control: This involves the ongoing monitoring and measurement of processes to ensure they are operating within acceptable limits. Juran highlighted the use of statistical methods and control charts to understand process performance and take corrective actions when necessary.

c. Quality Improvement: Juran emphasized the need for continuous improvement, encouraging organizations to adopt a systematic approach to problem-solving and root cause analysis to eliminate defects and reduce variation.

Philip Crosby: Zero Defects

Philip Crosby: Zero Defects

Philip Crosby, known for his emphasis on prevention rather than detection, advocated for the concept of “Zero Defects.” His proposition suggests that organizations should strive for error-free performance and aim to prevent defects from occurring in the first place. Crosby believed that defects are not inevitable and can be eliminated through a focus on quality at every stage of the process. He emphasized the importance of a quality culture, employee involvement, and the use of quality improvement tools and techniques to achieve zero defects.

These three propositions by Deming, Juran, and Crosby represent different perspectives on quality management, highlighting the importance of systems thinking, proactive planning, continuous improvement, and prevention in achieving high-quality products and services. Organizations often draw inspiration from these gurus’ principles to develop their own quality management approaches tailored to their specific needs and contexts.


9748882085 | 7980975679 | 9836953772

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *